Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thegreatdr (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 12 May 2021 (Response. How can I fix an issue I can't detect?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

So I reviewed this article under an old username five years ago, and I rubber stamped it as I thought there were no issues. The me five years ago was also not aware of the whole section describing each deck used close paraphrasing in its entirety. Personally, I am not sure this article still passes the GA criteria with a large part of the material gone, so this is why I'm starting a community reassessment. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add on which criteria the article doesn't meet anymore is 3a, which is "address the main aspects of the topic". Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since I can't view the edit history of that article, I have no idea from where/wence that content came. It's a serious catch 22, no? Thegreatdr (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]