Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hive (server)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Hive (server) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find enough in-depth sourcing from independent sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 15:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 15:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
It is one of the oldest Minecraft servers and also one of the few servers of this age that still exist today and is known to many PvP players. In my opinion, there is definitely relevance, it just needs to be presented more clearly by finding and using more third party sources, which is why I think the third party tag is appropriate. However, there are already some reliable third party sources cited, which is why I think the topic passes WP:GNG. Admittedly, the majority of sources are first-hand, but that is not a problem with regard to neutrality if you look at what they are used for and, as I said, I think the third party tag is appropriate and sufficient here. --Maxeto0910 (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable video game server failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Of the reliable independent sources, Polygon is just a name mention, PCGamesN is barely a paragraph in a listicle, Eurogamer appears to have more content at a glance but is really half a dozen generic sentences. Not sure about Sportskeeda and Gamepur reliability, but they are also just a paragraph in a listicle. With the amount of reliable sourcing, an entry in Minecraft server#Notable servers is sufficient. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Minecraft server per above.78.36.163.169 (talk) 06:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC)