Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albertaont/Archive
Appearance
Albertaont
- Albertaont (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
24 May 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- AnotoKiwata (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I reverted this edit by User:Albertaont (Ao) and suggested talk page discussion. A day later, a new account User:AnotoKiwata reverted my edit with an edit summary which appears to be speaking on behalf of Ao and which shows a clear signal that they are some kind of a sock. On the other hand, Ao is a highly suspicious account that has long been the subject of my and others' scrutiny, e.g., [1] [2] [3]. Thank you. Normchou 💬 00:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]Clerk note: I moved this to Cdswalkthrough, where the archivenotice was pointing, realised that they were found to be unrelated to Albertaont and self-reverted; just noting that I'm tweaking the notice to not point at a different case anymore. --Blablubbs|talk 00:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Unrelated. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Clerk note: CU says unrelated, and while there are only two edits, there are enough differences to make me think these are two different people. Closing GirthSummit (blether) 11:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)