Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Marshals of the First French Empire/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BasedMises (talk | contribs) at 23:16, 18 June 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

List of Marshals of the First French Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): BasedMisesMont Pelerin 00:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have worked extensively on this list. I brought it from having 0 sources and no table, with no images, to having enough to qualify. I strongly suggest that you drop as many suggestions as possible below. Thank you! BasedMisesMont Pelerin 00:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • "The rank was used sporadically" - later on you specifically state that it wasn't a rank...........?
  • Corrected
  • "In total, 26 men have been awarded" - this should be "In total, 26 men were awarded" given that the award is long defunct
  • Done
  • "The most recent promotions to field marshal came in 1815" - first mention of "field marshal" - how does that relate to the role being discussed?
    Done
  • "when Napoleon promoted Grouchy" - use Grouchy's full name and wikilink them both
  • Done
  • "Some, including Poniatowski, served in foreign armies" - can't see any reason to only use his surname here given that he's not been mentioned before
  • Done
  • "One Marshal, and one future non-Napoleonic Marshal was present at the Battle of Vitoria" - assuming this refers to two different men, then the comma shouldn't be there and it should be "were present", not "was present"
  • Removed the "Non-Napoleonic Marshal"
  • I would merge the existing background section into the lead as both are pretty short and they don't duplicate each other
  • Battle of Waterloo wikilinked twice in consecutive sentences - only the first one needs to be linked
  • Done
  • In the paragraph starting "Marmont, born in 1774", you should use their full names, not just their surnames, as they haven't been mentioned before.
  • Done
  • Name column in the table should sort based on surname, not forename
  • Done

@ChrisTheDude I have corrected your initial concerns. Thank you for bringing them up. BasedMisesMont Pelerin 21:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must've accidentally removed it. BasedMisesMont Pelerin 18:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you add it back, make sure that the names are set to sort based on surname rather than forename.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
  • The table needs a caption, e.g. at the top of the table code add "|+ <table_caption_text>" or, if that caption would duplicate a nearby header, you can make it only for screen reader software like "|+ {{sronly|<table_caption_text>}}". Captions allow screen reader software to jump to tables by name.
Done
  • Column headers need to be marked with colscopes, e.g. "!Name" should be "!scope=col| Name". Colscopes and Rowscopes (below) allow screen reader software to properly read out tables verbally.
Done
Done
  • Images need alt text, which can just be e.g. "painting of Louis-Alexandre Berthier"; if it's not present, screen reader software instead reads out the file name. --PresN 14:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Okay. I will get right to fixing that. Thank you. BasedMisesMont Pelerin 15:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from HAl

  • The lead is too short. I would recommend merging the background text into it and then expanding it further.
  • Could you make the table sortable?
  • For the citations with pages ranges, it should be "pp." not "p.". (I think)
Thanks for the comments. On Wikipedia it should be p. not pp. though (normally I write pp). I'll get right to fixing those problems. BasedMisesMont Pelerin 23:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all for now. ~ HAL333 18:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]