Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Wang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheChronium 05:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Kate Wang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Kate Wang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual that does not pass notability, and thus the page is a permastub. SCMP is RS, but Forbes Profiles is not. A WP:BEFORE search did not find any other RS. Coverage in just one RS fails the requirements of WP:GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:BASIC. ——Serial 13:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. I see lots of Chinese-language sources. These turned up on a quick search, and I'm sure a more thorough search would find more.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, me too; but all just passing mentions unfortunately...但不是對所有事物，——Serial 15:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

I disagree. The first one[12] gives biographical information about her education and career. The second one[13] gives fairly detailed information about her career. The third one[14] meanders in topic somewhat but also includes biographical information about her. I can go on if you'd like, but I don't think any of the sources I linked can be described as just passing mentions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

揮動你的手. ——Serial 16:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep - Plenty of significant coverage in Chinese language per search by Mx. Granger. WP:GNG is met. VocalIndia (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

很少 ——Serial 16:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep She has significant coverage from the SCMP article, this Forbes Staff Daily Cover article, and the Chinese language sources Granger provided. Jumpytoo Talk 21:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per the sources provided by Mx. Granger (talk. Peter303x (talk) 09:17, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.