User talk:Xpërt3

What are you doing

The source you used in the article Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia was first used on 29 April 2012, so it was combined and the access date was corrected. Therefore, access date will be changed because it was first used on this date, okay?

Please do not do such nonsense, unnecessary edits, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Egeymi: I will keep that mind in next time as I'm always trying to improve since I haven't been on Wikipedia for a long time. But please keep in mind that in contrast, you have been here for nearly 9 years. You do not need to speak to me in such an improper manner. Xpërt3 (talk)

Then please or at least read what I write in the edit summary. Such edits just waste my time. I stated similar things to you when you were using the other name. --Egeymi (talk) 12:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think lying is a good habit. This issue that happened has nothing to do with past edits. The only edit summaries that you made were about overlinked words. That's all. Only a few hours ago, you used shortened words to point out the issue. I did not understand what you meant until now. Now returning to the main topic, you shouldn't make false accusations and excuses like "I stated similar things to you" to fit your argument. It's not going to help either of us. Also, you could've edited my talk page or communicated with me earlier if you found these edits to be so troublesome. Xpërt3 (talk)

No, I am not lying, I refer to my communication with you when you were using the name, Schoudhury3, okay. You could not accuse me of being a liar. --Egeymi (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep making excuses on top of excuses? Honestly, it's a shame that an editor like you would speak to others in such a childish and immature manner. You should be nicer to your fellow Wikipedians. Xpërt3 (talk)

Use tags

There is a bunch of useful tags that you can wrap your proposals around like {{divbox}} e.g.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut malesuada efficitur quam eu volutpat. Phasellus nisi urna, sollicitudin ac velit eu, dictum ornare risus. ^[1]^[2]

^ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut malesuada efficitur quam eu volutpat.
^ Phasellus nisi urna, sollicitudin ac velit eu, dictum ornare risus. Curabitur mauris purus, iaculis ac fringilla et, interdum ut libero.

Hope my unsolicited advice is welcome.--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 18:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zakir Naik

Assalamualaikum brother, I know you from the edits of Zakir Naik. I've been editing Naik from the past three months. Earlier the wiki of Zakir was having so many flaws. Just like Indian media, the editors here declared him a terrorist. Thank you for your cooperation it is much better now. But some editors just because they hate Naik are constantly ruining the page. Beware of them. Right now I'm more focused on the hindi version of Zakir's wiki .. Please you look out here Maaz143 (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maaz143: I agree, the English version of the article was much worse than before. I corrected most of these problems, but some areas need some work. I have been busy lately, so I haven't been able to correct some areas unfortunately. I think the article is in decent form, but needs work. Although we both believe that Zakir Naik is not a terrorist, it is true that other people believe he is and we need to include their opinions. Wikipedia usually includes all of the people's opinions. For example, Wikipedia allows people to state their opinion of whether they believe he is a terrorist or not. The article has opinions that Zakir Naik is a terrorist, but no opinions about Zakir Naik not being a terrorist. I will soon add the opinion that Zakir Naik is not a terrorist. I'll always be here to cooperate and help if you need it. Xpërt3 (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I'll help you too SuvarnaAdhikari (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the help from all of you. I hope that we can stop the editors who are causing disruptions. Xpërt3 (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ! Suvarna and I are working on hindi wiki of Naik. Please let us know if you need any help Maaz143 (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maaz143: @SuvarnaAdhikari: I need the two of you to go onto the English talk page on Zakir Naik and go to the "Mass Content Removal" section and vote with consensus please. Thanks. Xpërt3 (talk) 01:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maaz143: Brother, if you know anyone else that could help gain consensus on the Wikipedia talk page on the English version, I would appreciate it. So far, it is considered 2-3. If we get @SuvarnaAdhikari: to send message on the Zakir Naik talk page about disagreements with others, it will be 3-3. If you know anyone else who agrees with us, please tell them to engage on the Zakir Naik talk page. Assalamualaikum. Xpërt3 (talk) 16:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll inform her Maaz143 (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ishan87: Brother, I also see that you agree with us. Can you send a message on the Zakir Naik talk page in the mass content removal section? Thanks. Xpërt3 (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi Xpërt3! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Zakir Naik that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ArcMachaon (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the useful clarification. I did not exactly know the use of minor edits before. I appreciate it. Xpërt3 (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

If you continue your disruptive editing on Zakir Naik, ignoring the talk page consensus then your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 05:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have two users who have agreed with me, so it is technically 3-3. Your threats certainly do not help as the article as a whole has problems that need continious fixing and cannot be done in a single edit. I encourage you to do research on what I am pushing, and come back with a response. I will be waiting. Xpërt3 (talk) 15:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vote, and having side discussions on your talk page is not done. Get consensus on the article talk page, if you don't but continue this behavior then your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 16:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your threats are not useful in the current situation that I am in now. I am in the process of gaining consensus, and so far, I have gained one person. Please be patient. Xpërt3 (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are now canvassing and increasing your disruptive behavior. Stop it, and these are not threats, these are warnings to cease your disruptive behavior and this is my final warning to you. —SpacemanSpiff 03:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been listening, and I haven't been causing any problems lately. I've just asked other users if they can participate in the disusssions and show their opinions. I just learned now that this is disruptive, and I will stop now. Now about reverting, months ago, I didn't know much about Wikipedia and learned at the time about this. I have stopped. Xpërt3 (talk) 15:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut malesuada efficitur quam eu volutpat.

[2] Phasellus nisi urna, sollicitudin ac velit eu, dictum ornare risus. Curabitur mauris purus, iaculis ac fringilla et, interdum ut libero.

[1]

[2]