Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRAX Commander
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 04:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CRAX Commander (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable - sources are either first-party or obscure websites (and most of them return 404). Google News returns some Russian websites that are either lists or comments on articles. Looking at non-automated edits, it seems like this is self-promotion by a few connected users. byteflush Talk 03:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject is commercial software. Therefore, really good sources are necessary to support the article. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 00:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.