Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastezsi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anastezsi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a search brought up only directory listings. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not satisfy NFILM's criteria. I searched a lot but only found entries on comprehensive databases. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 01:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't see any source of notability. Mehmood.Husain (talk) 09:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.