Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Tchaikovsky Competition 2011 – Piano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

International Tchaikovsky Competition 2011 – Piano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is nothing but a long list of minutae about one category of one music competition. There are no similar pages (for the other 15 competitions held) or, for example, the other categories of the 2011 event (violin, cello, and voice). Further, the minute and expansive specificity of the detail (the contents lists over 185 items for example) means it is only of interest to a very narrow audience. Finally, once the header links (which are deprecated) and the in-line external links (also deprecated) are removed, the remainder is just an unreferenced and unverified mass of dot point details (with no prose whatsoever after the lead). Also surprised that this article has been here for 10+ years without being questioned (i.e. deleted/redirected) earlier. JabberJaw (talk) 11:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. JabberJaw (talk) 11:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What an absolute mess. I've never seen such a massive article have zero sources and not a single word of prose after the lead. A google search leads me to a number of reliable sources covering the 2011 piano competition, so it arguably satisfies the notability requirements, but there is absolutely no hope of fixing this article unless we blow it up and start over. Mlb96 (talk) 02:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.