Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullfrogs and Butterflies II
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bullfrogs and Butterflies II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient notability for an independent article Dronebogus (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, for the same reason I removed the PROD...a Grammy nomination makes it notable. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - winning a Dove Award and being nominated for a Grammy is enough for this to be notable, even if reviews are lacking Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Same reasoning as others here. RomanSpa (talk) 07:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Per WP:NALBUM, being nominated for a Grammy suggests notability. Neiltonks (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - winning notable award.BabbaQ (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.