Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikini Round-Up (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bikini Round-Up

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable erotic film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 22:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even close to meeting the inclusion criteria for films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fred Olen Ray is a cult filmmaker with around 50 or 60 films listed in Wikipedia. Here is a link to his film template. No need to single out this title for deletion. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an argument about the notability of the filmmaker, but this particular film was not addressed. What is making this film notable? Where is the independent coverage of this film? BOVINEBOY2008 20:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The very fact that the director of this film has a Wikipedia template and over 50 of his films have Wikipedia articles makes the film notable by definition for a Wikipedia entry. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:NINI and WP:GNG. BOVINEBOY2008 00:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment, User:Roman Spinner, notability is not inherited, please read WP:NOTINHERITED. I have seen that you were directed to also read WP:NINI and WP:GNG in another AfD, but appears you have not. Films must be judged based on their own merit. Who appears in them, who directs them, and whether or not there are Wikipedia articles on the English Wikipedia for those actors/crewmembers, or an article on the film on another language's Wikipedia are all arguments that have no merit in a deletion discussion. Therefore, unless you can provide reviews to this film, or other coverage on the film that passes WP:NFILM, I am afraid that your Keep comment will be ignored by any admin closing this discussion as you have not addressed the concerns of the notability of this film adequately. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 22:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.