Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that there's a dearth of any reliable secondary sources that can be located. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a search for sources, the only ones that come up seem to be the lab's own website and passing mentions in the "authors' institutions" sections of publications. Lack of external coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources means that the group does not meet WP:GNG. DanCherek (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Merge to Anugrah Narayan College, Patna. It might overwhelm that article, but the topic of "research labs at Anugrah Narayan College" could be discussed there. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I was unable to locate any secondary sources that could be cited in Anugrah Narayan College, Patna to justify inclusion. I don't think a merge is an ideal option if the best citation we could provide in the broader article is a link to the lab's own website or to one of their publications. DanCherek (talk) 02:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Most of our coverage of Indian schools is bad. I certainly don't have sources; I'm not even sure what language they might be in. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:40, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist to try and ascertain consensus with increased participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article does not have sufficient significant reliable sources, and I can also not find any. ––FORMALDUDE^(talk) 06:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.