Jump to content

User talk:SosoDef99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SosoDef99 (talk | contribs) at 19:38, 28 January 2007 (thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SosoDef99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was filing an RFC on MrDarcy and had up to 48 hours for his abuse of policy as an administrator. He filed a checkuser on me and the results came back inconclusive Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mykungfu . Which should because I am in no way mykungfu and filed an RFC because of his frequent abuses. MrDarcy's abuse of policy continues especially for his unwarranted attacks on User talk:Real96 . Filing a checkuser on him even though he hadn't done a thing. I dont see how if my only edit was an RFC and I haven't done anything why am i being labeled a sockpuppet? i'm requesting an unblock request. I'd like to finish my RFC.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was filing an RFC on MrDarcy and had up to 48 hours for his abuse of policy as an administrator. He filed a checkuser on me and the results came back inconclusive Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mykungfu . Which should because I am in no way mykungfu and filed an RFC because of his frequent abuses. MrDarcy's abuse of policy continues especially for his unwarranted attacks on User talk:Real96 . Filing a checkuser on him even though he hadn't done a thing. I dont see how if my only edit was an RFC and I haven't done anything why am i being labeled a sockpuppet? i'm requesting an unblock request. I'd like to finish my RFC.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was filing an RFC on MrDarcy and had up to 48 hours for his abuse of policy as an administrator. He filed a checkuser on me and the results came back inconclusive Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mykungfu . Which should because I am in no way mykungfu and filed an RFC because of his frequent abuses. MrDarcy's abuse of policy continues especially for his unwarranted attacks on User talk:Real96 . Filing a checkuser on him even though he hadn't done a thing. I dont see how if my only edit was an RFC and I haven't done anything why am i being labeled a sockpuppet? i'm requesting an unblock request. I'd like to finish my RFC.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was filing an RFC on MrDarcy and had up to 48 hours for his abuse of policy as an administrator. He filed a checkuser on me and the results came back inconclusive Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mykungfu . Which should because I am in no way mykungfu and filed an RFC because of his frequent abuses. MrDarcy's abuse of policy continues especially for his unwarranted attacks on User talk:Real96 . Filing a checkuser on him even though he hadn't done a thing. I dont see how if my only edit was an RFC and I haven't done anything why am i being labeled a sockpuppet? i'm requesting an unblock request. I'd like to finish my RFC.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.