Jump to content

Interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 12:24, 18 September 2021 (Alter: title. Add: pmid, s2cid, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Eastmain | Category:AfC pending submissions by age/1 day ago | #UCB_Category 38/82). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • Comment: Lots of sections are unsourced. scope_creepTalk 20:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory)

Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory).[1] was developed by Ronald P. Rohner at the University of Connecticut. IPARTheory is an evidence-based theory of socialization and lifespan development that seeks to describe, predict, and explain the major consequences and correlates of interpersonal acceptance and rejection in multiple types of relationships worldwide.[2][3] It was previously known as Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory (PARTheory) but has since been applied to important relationships beyond parent-child interactions.[4] The name was changed to IPARTheory to reflect this larger scope.

Subtheories

IPARTheory is comprised of three primary subtheories which are interrelated. Together they address the effects of interpersonal acceptance and rejection, as well as the global application of the theory. The three subtheories are personality subtheory, coping subtheory, and sociocultural subtheory and model.[1]

Personality Subtheory

Personality subtheory primarily addresses the pancultural outcomes of perceived interpersonal acceptance and rejection. Personality is defined as "an individual's more or less stable set of predispositions to respond (i.e. affective, cognitive, perceptual, and motivational dispositions) and actual modes of responding (i.e., observable behaviors) in various life situations or contexts."[1] One major tenet of the theory states that all humans, regardless of racial, gender, cultural, or ethnic differences have a biologically-based need for acceptance and positive responses from the important people, or significant others, in their lives.[5] Significant others are people that share a lasting emotional bond with and are uniquely important to a child or adult, most often parents or romantic partners.

The nature of positive responses and acceptance behaviors from significant others may differ in specifics by culture and age.[6] When children or adults do not receive the acceptance or positive response they need, they will perceive this as a form of interpersonal rejection and respond in a combination of 10 apparent pancultural dispositions.[7] These dispositions include: anxiety, insecurity, hostility/aggression, dependency or defensive independence, negative self-esteem, negative self-adequacy, emotional unresponsiveness, emotional instability, negative worldview, and cognitive distortions.[1]

Dependency, or "the internal, psychologically felt wish or yearning for emotional (as opposed to instrumental or task-oriented) support, care, comfort, attention, nurturance, and similar behaviors from significant others" is a very common response from people seeking acceptance following perceived rejection.[1] People fall on a dependence continuum from independent to dependent. Where a person falls is primarily dependent on whether they perceive themselves to be accepted or rejected by significant others.[1] Children and adults who perceives themselves to have received enough acceptance tend to show normal dependence, while children and others who do not receive enough acceptance or face rejection often develop defensive independence.[8] Parental rejection or rejection from other significant others can result in impaired self-esteem, negative world-view, and emotional instability.[1] In order to cope with these negative feelings and outcomes, people who feel rejected may develop defensive independence, in which a person either does not seek out or actively avoids emotional support and attachment to significant others despite still craving acceptance. Control is an additional variable in where someone falls on the dependency curve, children with immature dependence receive a great deal of acceptance but also intrusive parental control.[1] This style of parenting is called "smother parenting" and children who experience it often struggle to develop age-appropriate social, emotional, and behavioral skills.[9]

Coping Subtheory

Coping subtheory seeks to understand why some children and adults do not appear to suffer the same ill effects of rejection that other rejected individuals face.[10] The theory concentrates on affective copers, who have reasonably good mental and emotional health in the face of adversity, unlike instrumental copers, who may find success academically or professionally but still suffer with impaired mental and emotional health.[11][12] The traits that make a good affective coper are still unclear, but coping subtheory uses the multivariate model of behavior to posit that the coping behavior of the individual is a function of interactions between the self (mental representations, biological, and personality characteristics of the individual), other (characteristics of the rejecting significant other(s), along with the form, frequency and severity of rejection), and context (other significant others, social-situational characteristics of the larger environment).[1] Traits that appear to be associated with good affective copers include a differentiated sense of self, a strong sense of self-determination, and the ability to depersonalize, among others.[13]

Sociocultural Systems Model and Subtheory

The sociocultural systems subtheory concentrates on major causes and sociocultural correlates of interpersonal acceptance-rejection in a global context.[1] The subtheory looks at larger sociocultural factors that influence how significant others show acceptance or rejection. Larger social institutions like the economic system, family structure, and political organization shape how much acceptance parents and other significant others offer.[14] Additionally, the cultural context can also influence how children and youth perceive their acceptance or rejection, and how they react to or cope with it.[7] The system is also bidirectional, a culture's tendency toward acceptance or rejection may result in different institutionalized expressive systems and behaviors, which can include people's spiritual and artistic beliefs and behaviors.[15]

The Warmth Dimension

IPARTheory posits that all significant interpersonal relationships fall along the warmth dimension, from interpersonal acceptance to interpersonal rejection, depending on how much love or warmth a person perceives from a significant other.[1][16] The specific physical, verbal, and symbolic behaviors associated with interpersonal acceptance or rejection may differ by culture or society, but the effects of feeling acceptance or rejection remain stable across cultures.[17][18] Interpersonal acceptance is marked by warmth, affection, comfort, emotional support, and love which is expressed by the significant other.[4] Relationships that are high in interpersonal rejection, on the other hand, are characterized by an absence of positive feelings and may also include emotional withdrawal, as well as the presence of psychologically or physically hurtful behaviors.[8]

Rejection may be experienced by any combination of four expressions: (1) cold or unaffectionate, (2) hostile or aggressive, (3) indifferent or neglecting, and/or (4) undifferentiated rejection.[1] Undifferentiated rejection is an umbrella term used to encompass situations where there are no clear behavioral indicators that a parent or significant other is rejecting but the individual does not feel cared about, appreciated, wanted, valued, or loved by that person.[8][13]

Copyrights Rohner Research Publications, 2019
Copyrights Rohner Research Publications, 2019

History of IPARTheory

IPARTheory was developed by Ronald P. Rohner, PhD. It was initiated during his time as a graduate student at Stanford University in 1959. While carrying out cross-cultural analyses on the outcomes of the rejection process of children, he found that parental rejection during childhood appeared to result in similar negative outcomes across the globe[1]. Early on, Rohner's research concentrated on parent-child relationships and the theory was dubbed the Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory (PARTheory) after he and Evelyn C. Rohner edited a special issue of Behavior Science Research (now Cross-Cultural Research) on "Worldwide Tests of Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory" in 1980[19]. However, by the 2000s, Rohner and other researchers like Abdul Khaleque had started investigating the effects of rejection in non-parental significant relationships. Khaleque carried out a study which found that the effects of intimate-partner rejection had similar effects in adulthood to those of parental rejection in childhood.[20] Following that research, other significant persons were included in research, including peers, best friends, siblings, teachers, coaches, in-laws, managers, and many others. In 2014, the name of the theory was changed to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) to reflect the broadened scope of the theory and research.

Further Information

Ronald P. Rohner's TED Talk on IPARTheory (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ePXxeGrfvQ)

The International Society for Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection (https://isipar.uconn.edu/)

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Rohner, Ronald P. (2021-08-03). "Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) and Evidence". Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 6 (1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1055. ISSN 2307-0919.
  2. ^ Khaleque, Abdul; Ali, Sumbleen (2017). "A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses of Research on Interpersonal Acceptance–rejection Theory: Constructs and Measures". Journal of Family Theory & Review. 9 (4): 441–458. doi:10.1111/jftr.12228. ISSN 1756-2589.
  3. ^ Faherty, Amanda; Eagan, Amber; Ashdown, Brien K.; Brown, Carrie M.; Hanno, Olivia (2016). "Examining the Reliability and Convergent Validity of IPARTheory Measures and Their Relation to Ethnic Attitudes in Guatemala". Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. 21 (4): 276–288. doi:10.24839/b21.4.276. ISSN 2164-8204.
  4. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Bjorklund, David F.; Pellegrini, Anthony D. (2002). The origins of human nature: Evolutionary developmental psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10425-000. ISBN 978-1-55798-878-2.
  6. ^ Rohner, Ronald P.; Khaleque, Abdul (2010-03-26). "Testing Central Postulates of Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory (PARTheory): A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural Studies". Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00040.x.
  7. ^ a b Ali, Sumbleen; Khaleque, Abdul; Rohner, Ronald P. (2015-09-01). "Pancultural Gender Differences in the Relation Between Perceived Parental Acceptance and Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adult Offspring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Worldwide Research". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 46 (8): 1059–1080. doi:10.1177/0022022115597754. ISSN 0022-0221. S2CID 145747100.
  8. ^ a b c Rohner, Ronald P. (November 2004). "The Parental "Acceptance-Rejection Syndrome": Universal Correlates of Perceived Rejection". American Psychologist. 59 (8): 830–840. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.830. ISSN 1935-990X. PMID 15554863.
  9. ^ Fernández-García, Carmen-María; Rodríguez-Menéndez, Carmen; Peña-Calvo, José-Vicente (2017-07-21). "Parental control in interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory: a study with a Spanish sample using Parents' Version of Parental Acceptation-Rejection/Control Questionnaire". Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology. 33 (3): 652–659. doi:10.6018/analesps.33.3.260591. ISSN 1695-2294.
  10. ^ Rohner, Ronald (2021-08-03). "Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) and Evidence". Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 6 (1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1055. ISSN 2307-0919.
  11. ^ Ki, Ppudah; Rohner, Ronald P.; Britner, Preston A.; Halgunseth, Linda C.; Rigazio-DiGilio, Sandra A. (2018-07-01). "Coping With Remembrances of Parental Rejection in Childhood: Gender Differences and Associations With Intimate Partner Relationships". Journal of Child and Family Studies. 27 (8): 2441–2455. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1074-8. ISSN 1573-2843. S2CID 149725669.
  12. ^ Zhang, Jiwen; Lo, Herman Hayming; Au, Alma Maylan (2021). "The buffer of resilience in the relations of gender-related discrimination, rejection, and victimization with depression among Chinese transgender and gender non-conforming individuals". Journal of Affective Disorders. 283: 335–343. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.059. ISSN 0165-0327. PMID 33578347. S2CID 231909446.
  13. ^ a b Ki, Ppudah; Rohner, Ronald P.; Britner, Preston A.; Halgunseth, Linda C.; Rigazio-DiGilio, Sandra A. (2018). "Coping With Remembrances of Parental Rejection in Childhood: Gender Differences and Associations With Intimate Partner Relationships". Journal of Child and Family Studies. 27 (8): 2441–2455. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1074-8. ISSN 1062-1024. S2CID 149725669.
  14. ^ Khaleque, Abdul; Rohner, Ronald P. (2002). "Perceived Parental Acceptance-Rejection and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural and Intracultural Studies". Journal of Marriage and Family. 64 (1): 54–64. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00054.x. ISSN 1741-3737.
  15. ^ Brown, Carrie M.; Homa, Natalie L.; Cook, Rachel E.; Nadimi, Fatimah; Cummings, Nastassia (2015). "Perceived Parental Acceptance-Rejection and Artistic Preference: Replication Thirty Years Later". Acta de Investigación Psicológica. 5 (3): 2204–2210. doi:10.1016/s2007-4719(16)30010-2. ISSN 2007-4719.
  16. ^ Rohner, Ronald P.; Lansford, Jennifer E. (2017). "Deep Structure of the Human Affectional System: Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance–Rejection Theory". Journal of Family Theory & Review. 9 (4): 426–440. doi:10.1111/jftr.12219. ISSN 1756-2589.
  17. ^ Le, Khanh P.; Ashdown, Brien K. (2021-01-02). "Examining the Reliability of Various Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) Measures in Vietnamese Adolescents". The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 182 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/00221325.2020.1827218. ISSN 0022-1325. PMID 33073740. S2CID 224781075.
  18. ^ Cheah, Charissa S. L.; Li, Jin; Zhou, Nan; Yamamoto, Yoko; Leung, Christy Y. Y. (2015). "Understanding Chinese immigrant and European American mothers' expressions of warmth". Developmental Psychology. 51 (12): 1802–1811. doi:10.1037/a0039855. ISSN 1939-0599. PMID 26479547.
  19. ^ Rohner, Ronald P. (1980). "Worldwide Tests of Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory: An Overview". Behavior Science Research. 15 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1177/106939718001500102. ISSN 0094-3673. S2CID 144391265.
  20. ^ Khaleque, Abdul; Rohner, Ronald P. (2009). "Intimate adult relationships, parent-child relationships, and psychological adjustment: A meta-analysis of cross-cultural studies". PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e683212011-070. Retrieved 2021-08-09.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interpersonal_acceptance-rejection_theory&oldid=1045036280"