Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiktor Kociuban

Wiktor Kociuban

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable to meet WP:NARTIST. Does not pass WP:ANYBIO, either. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not delete In my humble opinion the article should not be removed. The artist has collaborated with many legendary names, but what is more important, he has a significant contribution in performing the new music, he made many world prapremiers. I will add more sources and some content to prove it. Atomksk (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My search only yielded passing mentions and this interview in a Polish art magazine. We're very far from WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST and WP:ANYBIO. Pilaz (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The articles is improved, corrected and cmopleted with the sources, a lot of references, before sharing your opinion, please review the new currect, new version. Atomksk (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @Atomksk: The sources you added only give passing mentions to the author and don't talk about him, so they don't contribute to WP:GNG. In our jargon, they may even constitute a WP:REFBOMB. The subject should be covered in-depth, independently, by reliable secondary sources. Also, you can't vote twice, so please replace your "Not delete" with "Comment". Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @Pilaz:  Thank you, I have changed to "Comment". But still I need a help how to improve it, since the sources I have added are independent and reliableAtomksk (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]