Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sassa Gurl (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. This was deleted as a G5 speedy. Missvain (talk) 19:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sassa Gurl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously created by various paid socks, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnclarencevelasco/Archive. The previous AfD was aborted when one of the multiple socks moved the article to draftspace; since then, the draft has been declined, deleted, recreated, moved to mainspace by a new UPE account, moved back to draftspace, declined, and moved to mainspace again.

In the meantime, the person the article is about has not gained any notability. No sign of meeting WP:BASIC, WP:ENT, or WP:GNG. bonadea contributions talk 20:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 20:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 20:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Move back to draft: A cursory search turns up lots of mentions of Sassa Gurl. Examples: [1] [2][3] It seems to meet WP:GNG. Article improvements seems like a better answer to the other issues instead of deletion. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One namedrop and two mentions – nothing to show notability. Given that this is somebody who makes a living as an influencer, there has to be a hell of a lot of actual independent coverage to indicate notability. Playing into the hands of the paid shills by keeping or redraftifying would not be particularly constructive. --bonadea contributions talk 21:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe there are any special and different notability guidelines for influencers. But I just posted in the village pump asking if there should be. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I never said there are SNGs for influencers. I'm sure there aren't. --bonadea contributions talk 22:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:BIO with sources presented by Bob drobbs. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have blocked the creator for CU-confirmed block evasion. The draft is technically eligible for G5, but since there is an ongoing AfD with Keep !votes I don't think it's appropriate to speedy it. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: the nominated page is now deleted for WP:G5 as of 18:05, 13 November 2021, therefore this discussion is officially closed. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.