User talk:Hatchens
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University Added source, please move to main page — Preceding unsigned comment added by TOKYO2021 (talk • contribs)
Participate in the discussion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2021_Uttarakhand_flood#Page_name A discussion was already started before you created the similiar article. Please tell your opinion there. Regards
Hi, you recently tagged my article for a speedy deletion, and I have understood why. I have changed the parts where you may think is disturbing, and I was hoping if you could check it out again. Thanks.
News1India Hindi News Channel
Hi,
I am trying to create a page for Draft:News1India, but it declined by you. This news channel in India. This is not any type of advrt. I am not understud that why this submission declined. I collect all information from Indian news channels. I am not connected to News1India. Can you help me to resolve all issus?
OFRA Cosmetics
Hi Hatchens! I saw your comment on my article denial, and I'm a little confused. I worked with a reviewer yesterday, and he helped me find super credible sources and said nothing about my tone. My goal here is to spread awareness about animal rights and cruelty-free beauty. I have another article draft I'm working on as well for an animal charity organization, Mardi Paws. Can you help me understand how I need to change my article and get it approved?
Good afternoon, Hatchens,
Thank you for taking a look at my Draft. I have made several changes over the last month or so in order to continue to formalize the tone and to make additional changes recommended by a previous reviewer (I have been working on this for a while now). I just made some additional changes as well just now. Are there any more areas that to your eye clearly need improvement? I'm having some trouble continuing to find ways to neutralize/flatten the tone (this is my first Wikipedia article, so please forgive my amateurism!). Thank you for your help - I'm looking forward to finishing this one up so I can start on my next one.
Good afternoon, Hatchens,
I went ahead and made numerous, additional changes to the draft. It is substantially more factually-driven and more neutral in tone now - thank you for your help.
Mohammed bin Rashid Centre for Leadership Development (MBRCLD)
Hi Hatchens,
I recently uploaded an article under for the Mohammaed Bin Rashid Centre for Leadership Development and I have noticed that it has gotten rejected within less than an hour. I have reviewed the article and I see nothing but facts in it, much like any other page about a learning centre or training institute. May I know why it was rejected and what I can do to improve it?
Draft: Arunabha Ghosh
Please let me know what needs to be changed. I have removed a lot of the language which sounded 'like an advertisement', but the submission was still rejected (for the third time). All of the statements made have citations and legitimate references. Not making any exaggerated claims or anything.
Hi Hatchens,
Thank you for taking time to look at my draft and leaving a comment on the page (Comment: VCs are generally considered notable. But, that doesn't mean puffery is allowed. Kindly redraft it, and submit it for a review.). According to the criteria for notable academics, I believe I article should qualify. I made a lot of edits and provided secondary sources that are independent of the subject in the article. It got declined few times and now I am not sure what is the reason. Are secondary sources in Bengali language are the issue or the writing style of the article? I would really appreciate any advise from you that would help. Thank you very much.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximroy (talk • contribs) done by TTP1233 (talk · contribs).
Request on 13:27:13, 19 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Anderson1970
- Anderson1970 (talk · contribs)
Hello, this is regarding the comments on my recent entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Bengal_Club As I am new to Wikipedia and the editor's comments appeared to be rather broad, I am writing to request specific guidance in what needs change in what section. I would appreciate any assistance. Thank you.
Introductory paragraph:
- Does the editor wish each and every description of the subject institution by the press to be removed, or only some? Alternatively, should the descriptions simply be summarised in two or three words and the relevant press articles be footnoted? In other words, is the problem one of verbosity or verisimilitude? - Does the editor wish the quote by the well-known columnist and the well-known novelist, describing their respective perceptions of the subject institution, to be removed?
History: - Does the editor wish the names and backgrounds of important historical figures who headed the subject institution to be deleted? - In the section on 21st century history, does the editor wish all references to essays by prominent scholars and writers, describing their respective perceptions of the subject, to be removed? Or, should the perceptions be summarised in two or three words and the essays footnoted? - Does the editor wish the details of historical discrimination in the subject institution, and statements by famous historical figures on the same, to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the details of the architectural history of the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos (which are stock images on Wikimedia) to be deleted?
Notable visitors: - Does the editor wish the name of any historical figure who visited the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos of the historical figures (which are stock images on Wikimedia) to be deleted?
Notable speakers: - Does the editor wish the name of any important speaker to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the photos of two well-known personalities speaking at the subject institution to be deleted?
Notable events: - Does the editor wish the mention of any event held at the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted?
Facilities: - Does the editor wish the mention of any facility at the subject institution to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the quotes from the press to be deleted? Or, perhaps summarised and footnoted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?
Cuisine: - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted, including the portions of potential historical significance? - Does the editor wish the favourable reviews by the press/scholars/experts to be deleted? Or, alternatively, summarised in a line or two and footnoted?
Art and artefacts: - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?
Literary references: - Does the editor wish for any specific mention of a writer or book to be deleted? - Does the editor wish for any of the photos to be deleted? - Does the editor wish the entire section to be deleted?
Thank you.
Review of Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative submission
Hello, Hatchens. I will be submitting a new draft for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gulf_of_Mexico_Research_Initiative NMDann (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)NMDann
Deletion: Ofra Cosmetics
Hi! I just noticed my page was deleted after it was approved by the Articles of Creation process. I saw it was nominated, but I didn't see the nomination in time to contribute to the discussion. Please tell me what I can do to get it back up?BaileighD (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello to the amazing Hatchens, It's been three months since the rejection of the article and I have made significant changes to it. I would love to know your input on the article and would love to improve it so the article could get back on the main page. If you could please let me know what other changes I could make to the article and how I could move one more step towards getting the page back on. Thank you for your time. Rooz1370 (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)