Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Doppleganger
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:53, 27 December 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Doppleganger[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Doppleganger (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Cadden (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
User Dœ αTΩC 16:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
The puppetmaster (name of band) has no contribs. Registered his account on may 8 2006. User:Cadden created the following on his user page (13:44, May 6, 2008): [1]. On 15:11, May 6, 2008 he put the same/similar text like [2] on User:Doppleganger's user page [3]. I therefor highly suspect that both accounts are owned by the same person. Cadden's contribs. Puppet is writing in his own user space and in the puppetmaster's user space about a band which has the exact name as the puppetmaster account.
- Comments
A simpler explanation is that the accounts belong to two different people, and User:Cadden has hijacked User:Doppleganger's userpage. Rather than a sockpuppetry case, this appears to me to be a simple case of someone spaming their band's info on an old, unused userpage. Either that, or User:Doppleganger has been very, very, very patient. --barneca (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
I went ahead, assumed I was correct, deleted User:Doppleganger and User talk:Doppleganger, and left a note on User talk:Cadden. I don't frequent WP:SSP often enough to remember how to archive a report, but if someone sees this, it can be archived I think. --barneca (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. I know this is already closed - but as additional info. - The contribution of User:Doppleganger have been oversighted and have a totally different subject than the adverts by User:Cadden. Agathoclea (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]