Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trendsies/Archive
Appearance
Trendsies
- Trendsies (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
10 October 2010
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Nazarethian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ip101 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Sven Manguard
[edit]This is a cut and past from ANI, where sockpuppetry in an AfD became an issue in a discussion on an article.
- User:Trendsies and User:Nazarethian are Confirmed. User:Ip101 is Possible to the former two due to similar approximate geographical location and user agents. –MuZemike 21:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
No one got banned despite the sockpuppetry. This is a request for a confirm and block, and may not need a full investigation. Sven Manguard Talk 22:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
[edit]See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
[edit]Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]Administrator note Not blocking Ip101 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) due to differences in behavior combined with only a "possible" result. Blocked the sockpuppet. Sockmaster blocked 1 week. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 17:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing left to do here. -- DQ (t) (e) 17:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)