Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Addams Family (upcoming film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Addams Family (upcoming film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested without addressing concern Fails WP:NFILM. Too soon. BOVINEBOY2008 12:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article does say that the film is currently being animated by Cinesite Studios; that statement is supported by reliable sources. I thought that would show that the article is notable. Superchunk22 (talk) 07:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it's currently being animated it explicitly fails WP:NFF. PriceDL (talk) 08:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not far enough along to justify having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF. Film is clearly still in the pre-production process. Sro23 (talk) 07:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with it being in pre production process, therefore meeting WP:NFF. It is also is a cleary example of what wikipedia is not.—Formal Dude^(talk) 00:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retool I think that this article should be retooled into a draft page. Since it's too early in production, it should just be retooled into a draft page as opposed to just deleting it altogether. Superchunk22 (talk) 00:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be alright to retool this article into a draft instead of just deleting it altogether? Superchunk22 (talk) 20:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.