Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Computer Solutions (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt, for a few years at least. Request recreation on WP:DELREV Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite Computer Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted per WP:G11 three times as unambiguious advertising and once per WP:A7 as no indication of importance. Speedy deletion recently (and correctly, IMO) declined for deletion per WP:G4, recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, since it is different and has been expanded. But that doesn't make it any less promotional. Propose to delete and salt. Mduvekot (talk) 23:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and probably salt due to persistent recreation, following G11 and AfD deletions. Sourcing does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH and the article is entirely promotional, bordering on G11. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination and also protect it from being created in the future. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.