Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cath Long
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:37, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:37, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cath Long (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not appear to meet the notability requirements for inclusion - see WP:GNG and WP:BIO - contested PROD Chzz ► 21:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Subject appears to fail WP:BIO. Topher385 (talk) 20:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.