Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abjol Miah
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:48, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:48, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 09:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Abjol Miah[edit]
- Abjol Miah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Subject is a city councillor in a borough of London, and a candidate for an obscure party in the upcoming general election. Of the five sources cited, none actually help establish his notability. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Subject is the candidate for the Respect party for the Bethnal Green and Bow seat in the upcoming general election. Although a small party, Respect won this seat in the last election and thus is the incumbent party defending it in the next. Abjol Miah therefore stands a real chance of becoming an MP at the next election. Do Not Delete. --Jackd88 (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- To this, I would reply that the incumbent candidate would be inherently notable, not the one taking his place. If Miah ends up being an "also ran", then he is not notable unleess there is another reason to consider him notable. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 12:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. Hasn't even been elected yet. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and ChildofMidnight. Broccoli (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.