Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian Industrial
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:58, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:58, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. extransit (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Victorian Industrial[edit]
- Victorian Industrial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete: No evidence that genre is notable. As an aside, something needs to be done about this; maybe a CSD tag for bogus genres? C1k3 (talk) 00:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Just another made-up genre. There is a certain spread of the term on the internet due to Ms. Autumns usage of it, but I can't find any relevant evidence for notability. -- Lacrimus (talk) 23:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not only is it not notable, it is not a real genre. Much like HIM's "Love Metal" it is a term that was made up by the artist in question. In order to be "Victorian Industrial" one would think she would have to at least play some derivative of industrial music, no? - ParadoxBacklash (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Would appear to be redundant to steampunk, the usual label. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. Over and over, articles of new or obscure genres are deleted. AfD is littered with such noms/deletions. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.