Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Barclay (Commissioner)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:21, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:21, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. delete; the political career is not notable; otherwise, it is a clear BLP 1E situation. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bruce Barclay (Commissioner) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The BLP violates WP:1E. The subject is solely notable for one event. Two years later, his trial is only being reported in the local press. He is not an admirable person but that does not make him notable. Will Beback talk 06:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Will Beback talk 21:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Will Beback talk 21:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. — Will Beback talk 21:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very weak keep per WP:BARE - most local politicans are not notable per WP:POLITICIAN, but he was commisioner of a county with a population of over 200,000 residents. Bearian (talk) 22:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A city or county official with one scandal is a classic definition of a 1E. Size doesn't matter when trying to find an exception to WP:POLITICIAN, (hmmm, given what he's charged with I should probably rephrase that...) Unless there's anything else he did that was noteworthy, I can't see this article surviving. And I'm sorry, but while changing the property assessment schedule might be a landmark political coup in Cumberland County, it isn't that noteworthy to the global Wikipedia userbase. -- RoninBK T C 06:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability really isn't there. 200k is not a lot of people, well below the 100 largest counties in the country. RayTalk 16:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.