Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Girl the Musical
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:17, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:17, 5 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) KuroiShiroi (contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Call Girl the Musical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable musical, fails WP:NOTE, sparse references not only one reference reliable per WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. MuffledThud (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 19:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - turns out that blog quote was a reprint from a high-circulation newspaper, which I've tracked down and replaced in one reference. So there is one reliable source, and this should be taken into account in the deletion discussion. MuffledThud (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it tickles the GNG through use of WP:AFTER and both Google News and a regular G-search. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I originally started the article. I am a fan of the show and was surprised that it didn't have any page on Wikipedia. I don't really get all of this, so I hope I've done everythign right. Laurajames —Preceding undated comment added 06:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn - sorry about this, I didn't check thoroughly enough on the news search before nomimating. It's definitely got enough news coverage from reliable sources to support notability, and so have some of its creators, who appear to need articles of their own. Thanks User:Laurajames and User:MichaelQSchmidt for pointing out my error so politely. MuffledThud (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.