Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11th Commando Division
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:15, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:15, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 11th Commando Division (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unverifiable Bangladeshi military unit - [1] - [2].Claritas § 21:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, no notability, POV, some really odd word choice. All around, not worthy of an article. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 23:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This appears to be - at best - a small sub unit of a commando battalion and very unlikely to be notable in isolation Nick-D (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Reads like a recruitment pitch. Unecyclodpedic tone. No sources.Mtiffany71 (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteper nominator, Nick-D and Mtiffany71. No assertion of notability(CSD#A7). No sources at all, much less WP:RS and WP:V ones. walk victor falk talk 16:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.