Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood solutions
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:57, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:57, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blood solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems to be a small non-notable company. The sources listed are mostly self-published (linked in and the company's own site). We don't have articles on each of 10 different plumbers for a given village who all offer the standard plumbing services, do we?-- Syrthiss (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP. No reference to the company in the one independent source cited. Tevildo (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.