Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Walsh
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:05, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:05, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 04:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gerald Walsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I believe fails WP:CREATIVE. Prod declined by IP author. No gnews hits, web hits seem to be almost entirely self-published. RayAYang (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: his own website doesn't seem to mention other coverage, solo exhibitions, or substantial publications. -- Hoary (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are tons of hits for "Gerald Walsh," but none of them are the man mentioned in the article. All sources cited by the article fail to provide notability. Interestingly, a Google search points at Gerald Thomas Walsh who seems to be equally not notable. DARTH PANDAduel 14:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing in the article establishes notability, let alone provides citations to back the claims up.Theseeker4 (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Content reads like an advertisement; more suited for an art gallery exhibit than Wikipedia. sixtynine • spill it • 07:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.