Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Bangladesh
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:09, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:09, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Team Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability of this organization is in question. I cannot find Reliable sources that back up the notability of this youth organization. Mentions in google usually refers to sports teams from Bangladesh or "team(punctuation) Bangladesh". I think that we can't dabify this as "Team X" like Team America since this phrase is not part of any sports teams from Bangladesh. Lenticel (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Did not assert notability per WP:ORG even before the copyvio/WP:SOAPBOX was removed. Its generic name brings up many false positives on Google searches. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy: Non notable. Current one-liner satisfies CSD, so let's speedy-delete the page. --Ragib (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.