Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christy Lynn Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:BLP1E. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christy Lynn Martin

Female schoolteacher accused of sexual offenses towards students, which appears to have caused a flurry of transient media reports as with dozens of similar cases, but otherwise entirely unremarkable. Fails WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:BLP1E. Sandstein 21:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:BLP1E applies. --kelapstick (talk) 21:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a thought; this topic does indicate an increasing trend of TEACHERS entering relationships with students and minors, is there an article on the very first such case? What was even the very first case? Anyhow, if this subject of recent warped tendencies of teacher-student relationships has been touched upon elsewhere, fine, but if not, this kind of an event should be noted and recorded for future generations...Turqoise127 (talk) 17:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a toss up: I think the WP:BLP1E definitely could apply; however, as a resource, someone researching the subject matter (perhaps a psych student) may need these for research. On the flipside, are we going to have an article for dozens and dozens of "cougars" having some kind of sexual relationship with a male student? I'd say default to keep and perhaps revisit the issue to see if something comes of it (i.e., perhaps some kind of case law or the like).--It's me...Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 01:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E and especially the "do no harm" ethic of WP:BLP. There lacks the depth-of-coverage to provide a balanced, WP:NPOV treatment of this living person, and as such, there should probably not be an article about her. A smattering of local news coverage and some police blotter stuff does not a complete article make. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge a stub to Sexting. Only one event, she's not notable otherwise, and teacher/student relationships are nothing new. Fences and windows (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.