Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaubleBar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 07:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BaubleBar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine coverage. Press release. Typical startup with blatant promotions. Light2021 (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim to notability is made in the lead. Fails WP:CORP for lack of in-depth coverage. Mostly rehash of news releases, blurbs, and things like the interviews in "Entrepreneurs Are Everywhere Show, No. 5" and "10 Minutes With… BaubleBar". --Bejnar (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable company covered in-depth on this page with varied, diverse source material. PsychoMaple (talk) 17:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diverse source material alright, but not independent (interviews, press releases) and not reliable. --Bejnar (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. Sections include: "History: Early days" (!); "Funding"; "Products and services"; "Partnerships", etc. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a company web site or a free means of promotion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.