Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Show for the Gods
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:48, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 03:48, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per author request and lack of keep !votes here. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A Show for the Gods[edit]
- A Show for the Gods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. There is no indication of notability in this yet-to-be-released book. There are no references or other reliable sources listed, so it fails WP:RS and WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 02:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- ArcAngel (talk) (review) 02:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom... and most likely spam. And WP:CRYSTAL. And whatnot. Should've been speedied. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Except that book aren't covered under CSD's that I can recall. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 08:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This AfD can be closed now as the author has blanked the page, and I have added db-g7's to the pages. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 20:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.