Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Jencka
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:13, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:13, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable composer; does not seem to be subject of any third party sources (though he has apparently contributed some articles - not enough to meet the criteria for an academic); only a few hundred trivial google hits; original research (his "playing style" and compositional inspirations). Dmz5 18:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hard to distinguish from WP:CRUFT TonyTheTiger 01:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to show he is more notable than 5 million other non-notable musicians: No articles about him, no tours, no albums, no reviews of concerts, no awards. Edison 16:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. —ShadowHalo 04:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.