Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David N Rice
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:20, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:20, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- David N Rice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A user has been spamming Wikipedia over the past few months to try and get some sort of page about this guy and his gambling business up, and they finally came up with something that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, but the notability of this individual is questionable, and sources are scarce. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to poor sourcing, and history of related spam. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 03:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Salt: if this is an ongoing thing. No independent evidence this fellow passes the GNG or WP:BIO. Ravenswing 17:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.