Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XBIZ Award for Girl/Girl Performer of the Year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XBIZ Award for Girl/Girl Performer of the Year

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the GNG. No nontrivial independent reliable sourcing. Other than passing mentions in a single newspaper story, all references are only industry related promotional materials. The parallel AVN award, which is more consequential, has been deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVN Award for All-Girl Performer of the Year. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly falls short of WP:GNG -- no substantial independent coverage in high quality sources. I'd suggest following up this AfD with nominations for all articles listed in the XBIZ Awards template, as I believe all of them have the same fundamental problem. -Pete (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable award, Fails GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 00:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- has not been the subject of discussion in independent RS. Otherwise, it's just a WP:DIRECTORY / WP:PROMO listing for the group that issues the awards. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Golden Globe of porn industry doesn't need any dust-dry lexicon promotion... --SamWinchester000 (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Less of a WP:REDUNDANTFORK than in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVN Award for Best New Starlet but the extra information are nominees which do not have independent citations which I feel violates WP:UNDUE and photos when wikipedia is WP:NOTGALLERY. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, of course XBIZ will tell us the wrong nominees, so let's take a completely different source... Porn sources are not forbidden. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would say (and explain) keep, but as that won't change anything: Keep trolling. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia and its great, big bunch of trivial lists, that's an eternal unification and widely accepted. Where is the substantial independent covarage in List of association football stadiums by capacity? Just try it, you won't be able to delete this great list. However, just keep deleting porn articles for non-sense reasons, which won't work on another topic. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 09:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.