Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federica Quercia
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:25, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Federica Quercia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person appears to fail all tennis notability guidelines. No main draws on the tour and no wins at the higher level ITF tournaments. The external link sources provide no evidence. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has won at least one $25,000 ITF women's tournament in doubles ref, which passes WP:NTENNIS.Ravendrop 01:54, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Delete per new guidelines. Ravendrop 05:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's old news. Tennis guidelines are here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG for lack of non-WP:ROUTINE sources (yes, I translated a handful) and WP:NTENNIS for lack of achievement. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.