Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kruuse af Verchow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:59, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:59, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kruuse af Verchow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Poorly sourced genealogical article (relying on a German Wikipedia user's page and a personal genealogical research) possibly relating one family of questionable notability to another family of questionable notability. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sort of minor nobility we do not include. DGG (talk) 05:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOR Drawn Some (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Umm...He died in 1790 but still resides in South Africa? WP:V WP:N WP:NOR and maybe a few others. Renaissancee (talk) 02:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.