Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Coleman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:59, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:59, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 15:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is more news journalist that is more famous and she is famous for this Bush thing, henceforth not notable at all. Dr Tobias Funke 19:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems notable enough to me.. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 20:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - I'm not into the Irish media, but if the affair warranted an article in the UK Sunday Times it seems to meet the notability threshold. Han-Kwang 20:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, seems notable enough to Keep --Rocksanddirt 20:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per Hankwang. JJL 22:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep, but rewrite, and maybe try a little harder with the POV. Kripto 11:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.