Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalifa Coastal Refinery
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:17, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:17, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Khalifa Coastal Refinery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and no notability asserted. This may partly because the refinery doesn't actually exist yet as both the only two references make clear. Speculative and crystal ball gazing. Velella Velella Talk 20:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notability is clearly established. I added some references, but there a lot of more media coverage, including by the mainstream agencies like Reuters. Also disagree with CRYSTALBALL as details of the planned project are published and available by different media sources. Beagel (talk) 21:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sufficient substantial RS coverage.--Epeefleche (talk) 12:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.