Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Moorings, New York (2nd nomination)
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:14, 14 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 02:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Moorings, New York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable subdivision. Two passing mentions in The New York Times, neither of which come close to in-depth coverage (these refs recently restored from the page history by the nominator as part of the due diligence for this AfD). Only two useful incoming links (previously three, but one was pointing to the wrong Moorings). Google search doesn't find anything of use, perhaps beause Moorings is a generic word and New York is a very big place. This has been up for AfD previously, but a very long time ago. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Not sure what the nom is talking about, but page two of the New York Times reference goes very in-depth about this community. [1] --Oakshade (talk) 06:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Gongshow Talk 15:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - multiple mentions in the Times? That's going a long way of the ultimate reliable source towards significant coverage. I also think this neighborhood might pass. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not particularly familiar with the geography, but isn't the New York Times a local paper in this context? Stuartyeates (talk) 04:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.