Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorena Sanchez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lorena Sanchez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD removed without explanation by IP without edit history. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete rank-and-file videofucker. no evidence of notability. - Altenmann >t 05:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Conur with nominator. There is nothing to suggest notablility. Finnegas (talk) 10:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails PORNBIO and GNG as the nominator states. No substantial RS coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.