Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Connecticut State Senate election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Star Mississippi (talk | contribs) at 02:20, 19 February 2022 (→‎2022 Connecticut State Senate election: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. a typo is not a reason for deletion when these subjects are routinely considered notable. Star Mississippi 02:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Connecticut State Senate election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It says took place on November 8, 2022. I don't know what is wrong with the article. Is it problem with the grammar, or will it take place on? In either way, it is too soon to become an article. And though Senate elections will be considered notable as per WP:N, but this article doesn't seem to pass WP:N or WP:GNG. I probably would have CSDed this article, but thought a discussion might be better, as the subject would be notable in the near future, but currently is too early to qualify to become an article. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 13:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they meet the same criteria:

2022 Alabama House of Representatives election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
With that said, the behavior of the creator of the article, dropping incomplete articles in mainspace and refusing to communicate, is unacceptable and should be dealt with, but that doesn't change that the topic is notable. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.