Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 August 26

< August 25	August 27 >

August 26

File:Mh3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mh3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{PD-self}}, but the source is given as http://mhchs.ccs.k12.nc.us/, which says at the bottom "© Cumberland County Schools" and links to a copyright notice that clearly indicates content from the site is copyrighted. There is no evidence that this image has been released into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mh1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mh1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{PD-self}}, but the source is given as http://mhchs.ccs.k12.nc.us/, which says at the bottom "© Cumberland County Schools" and links to a copyright notice that clearly indicates content from the site is copyrighted. There is no evidence that this image has been released into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sts-94 crew.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sts-94 crew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Pseudo-speedy (no source0 contested by anonymous user (see File talk:Sts-94 crew.jpg) so I'm bringing it here. Contested because the image was taken in space, where it supposedly could only have been by NASA personnel. I'm not sure whether or not this is true, so I'm neutral. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 07:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "clearly taken in space" is absurd and the main problem is lack of source that causes inability to verify whatever image is correctly described (WP:VER). Bulwersator (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is clearly taken in space though, since the orientation of items in the image would not be possible unless it was under microgravity conditions. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 03:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I see nothing strange Bulwersator (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - What do you mean by "nothing strange"?--Craigboy (talk) 11:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's clearly a NASA photo. Here's the source.--Craigboy (talk) 11:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Herbert Fröhlich.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: non-free Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbert Fröhlich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged with both {{Non-free promotional}} and {{GFDL}}. Sourced to [1], which appears to be dead. The subject is no longer living, and there is a non-free use rationale. No evidence is provided for the GFDL claim. The {{Non-free promotional}} tag is probably inappropriate; this is not a promotional image. —Bkell (talk) 08:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An archive verifies that this the image. Removing the GFDL license and swapping the {{Non-free promotional}} license with the {{Non-free fair use in}} license should resolve all the concerns. — ξ ^xplicit 01:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:423083main Shannahs 11-1600 1600-1200.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:423083main Shannahs 11-1600 1600-1200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Without real source ("nasa.gov" is only sligtly better than "internet"), I am unable to locate source.

di-no source template was removed with assertion that "copyright (or the lack of) is very clear here". Apparently only NASA is using electronic equipment.

As bonus, uploader decided that this PD-NASA file is "non-free or potentially non-free in its country of origin" ({{Do not move to Commons}} template) Bulwersator (talk) 08:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Bogus templates ({{PD-USGov}} directly contradicts {{Do not move to Commons}}) and no source. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader changed source to "NASA Kennedy Space Center archives", without providing proper source allowing for verification Bulwersator (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, {{bsr}} is basically no source in my opinion. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo douane 1055 (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo douane 1055 (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"I, the copyright holder of this work" is extremely dubious Bulwersator (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo DGSE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo DGSE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"I, the copyright holder of this work" is extremely dubious Bulwersator (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carla meets DalaiLama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carla meets DalaiLama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"I, the copyright holder of this work" is extremely dubious + this person uploaded other questionable files - see above Bulwersator (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jean-Paul Paloméros.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Paul Paloméros.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"I, the copyright holder of this work" is extremely dubious + this person uploaded other questionable files - see above Bulwersator (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Elrick Irastorza CSFA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elrick Irastorza CSFA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"I, the copyright holder of this work" is extremely dubious + this person uploaded other questionable files - see above Bulwersator (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Caroline astor cenotaph by satellite.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caroline astor cenotaph by satellite.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unused, may be unfree (uploader believes that "NASA World Wind which uses US Government datasets exclusively.") Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abedi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abedi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{PD-self}}, but this is a low-resolution image with no metadata that shows up in many other places on the Internet, sometimes at a higher resolution (try doing a TinEye or Google Images search for this image). The same uploader has also claimed GFDL and listed himself as the author for several images that were taken from Web pages (File:Abedi ali.jpg, File:Abedi carter.jpg, File:Abedi with pope.jpg, File:Bcci conference.gif, and File:Abedi pace.jpg), so I have little faith in his self-authorship claim here. —Bkell (talk) 19:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Courthouse brooklynboroughhall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courthouse brooklynboroughhall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{cc-by-2.5}}, but Flickr source page [2] says this photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license. "NonCommercial" and "NoDerivs" are not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 19:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nufussaym.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nufussaym.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{PD-old-100}}, but the photo was taken in 1935, so the photo itself is only 77 years old; it's impossible for the author to have died over 100 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Versai.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Versai.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{GFDL}}. This is apparently a photograph of the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919; according to [3], it is from the National Archives. The GFDL claim is absurd. The photo is probably in the public domain, but I can't find enough background on it to know for sure. —Bkell (talk) 20:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dutchstatues.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dutchstatues.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{PD-self}}, but source is given as "Free to use Flickr photo." The Flickr source is apparently [4], which says this photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic license. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:A-sam.417951046 a75062732a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A-sam.417951046 a75062732a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Swayambhunath Pigeons.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swayambhunath Pigeons.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Onearmbandits.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onearmbandits.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} and claimed to be self-created, but Flickr source page [7] says the photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Midnight bowling.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Midnight bowling.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}, but Flickr source page [8] says this photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 21:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:John Conlee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Conlee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. There are two versions of this image in the history. For the current version, the Flickr source page [9] says that the photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license; "NonCommercial" and "NoDerivs" are not free enough for Wikipedia. For the previous version, the Flickr source page [10] says that the photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license; again, "NoDerivs" is not free enough for Wikipedia. Both of the images in the history are cropped versions of the original Flickr photos, which may violate their "no derivatives" licenses. —Bkell (talk) 21:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.