Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoftoren
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) at 08:26, 24 February 2022 (Fix misnested tag lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:26, 24 February 2022 by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) (Fix misnested tag lint errors)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Punkmorten 18:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"There is no article in English yet on Hoftoren." So translate it instead of creating this entry...! Punkmorten 16:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC) OK then. Punkmorten 18:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think it is better than nothing even for people who do not speak Dutch.--Patrick 16:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'd have just put a speedy deletion tag on this, like db-empty. However, since we're actually discussing this, see the following link to see what "hoftoren" means. http://www.dreamstime.com/skyscraperthehoftoreninthehague-image325756 --Xyzzyplugh 16:41, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not a collection of links, not even interwikilinks. (And that's just incase the Speedy fails.) RJFJR 16:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per RJFJR. Sandstein 16:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. This is very deletable. --Deville (Talk) 17:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- As it stands now, the article is fine. --Deville (Talk) 17:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I changed it into a stub.--Patrick 17:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Terence Ong 17:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I withdraw my nomination. Punkmorten 18:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.