Talk:Vela Supercluster

Text and/or other creative content from Draft:Vela Supercluster was copied or moved into Vela Supercluster on 28 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Cosmology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.

Potential issues?

Hi, this looks like a clusterfuck, so someone with actual physics knowledge please cross-check ...

Text: "The combined dimensions of the walls are __115 km/s Mpc__ on the major dimensions and __90 km/s Mpc__ on the minor ones, which corresponds to about __385 million__ and __300 million__ light years"

Sidebar:

Major axis: __115 Mpc (375 Mly)__ h−1 ~0.676 (Hubble constant based on 2016 Planck data)
Minor axis: __115 Mpc (375 Mly)__ h−1 ~0.676 (Hubble constant based on 2016 Planck data)

There are (at least) three seeming inconsistencies in these two chunks of information:

First, "km/s Mpc" does not seem like a valid unit to me. Pretty sure it should only be Mpc
The conversion to light years is different between the text and the sidebar (one claiming 115Mpc are 385, the other claiming it's 375 million light years)
The minor axis in the sidebar does not match the "minor dimensions" in the text (115Mpc vs 90Mpc).