User talk:Zenkaino lovelive

Archives

Blocked indefinitely

As you immediately resumed your disruptive behaviour, I have reblocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Then what should I do? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry to make my disruptive behaviour. If I'm unblocked, I WON'T make a discussion to change the color scheme in like Motion picture content rating system for at least half a year. I would like to contribute in language-related and Microsoft Windows-related articles. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 18:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand what I've been blocked for: I'm sorry to make my disruptive behaviour which is to suggest pointless color scheme replacement of the articles like Motion picture content rating system. 2. I won't continue to cause damage or disruption: I will NOT make a discussion to change the color scheme in those articles. Also, if I think that any articles have incorrect parts, I'll write a draft and will make a discussion before putting information. 3. I'll make useful contributions instead: I would make productive contributions by adding true information only, and if a conflict is occurred, I'll talk or discuss it first. I would like to contribute in language-related and Microsoft Windows-related articles, etc. I'm politely requesting to review my block. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 01:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Last time you were unblocked it was because of this discussion: [1].

You made promises, apologies, all of the same things you are doing now. It was made clear to you there that there won't be a lot of tolerance for future disruption. You lasted barely 1 day here after that. You have used up your credibility. I am declining your unblock request. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 04:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then what should I do? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Find another hobby. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 04:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'll pursue WP:SO - that means no editing for six months, yes, six months, and then requesting an unblock here. ~~Does edits to my talk page also reset the six month timer?~~GN said to me, "No.". Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime: Thanks for answering. Then what should I do until December? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on the Wikipedia. Zero edits until the end of January, 2022. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering. Then I won't edit except my talk page for 6 months and will appeal in January. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 03:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You emailed me. No, I'm not interested in a conversation by email. --Yamla (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from this user's last edit is 9 March, 2022. --Yamla (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zenkaino, you have been banned from WP:Discord as you continuously kept bringing up your block despite numerous warnings. If and when you succeed in appealing your block, you may contact me for an unban. -- ferret (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it's 2022 now and I want a new chance for me to be a better Wikipedian here. I got blocked from Wikipedia in last July, because of my immediate resumption of pointless color scheme replacement suggestions, as it consituted disruptive edits. I'm still getting used to editing again on Wikipedia after having been unblocked around 8 months ago, and I'm trying to make the table more understandable, but I fully realize my behavior was disruptive. To be unblocked, blocked users have to leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, including their talk page, and then they have to request to be unblocked at their main account. I'm trying not to make the same mistakes from the past. I understand, regret, and apologize for my past mistakes after 8 months passed. I'm not a teenager anymore, but I'm a young adult. Please unblock me and I'll make sure not to suggest pointless color scheme replacement. I don't want be blocked forever, especially after almost 2 11/12 years of previously being blocked. If I'm unblocked, I will be a productive editor who always consults his fellow Wikipedians. I plan to make small and non-controversial contributions on language and Windows articles to English Wikipedia, and always discuss larger or more significant changes on the talk page or in a draft first. I haven't edited Wikipedia at all since I been reblocked because if I were to do that, that would impact my changes of getting unblocked. Please unblock me and thank you for your consideration. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking through your edits, all I see is messing around with tables and arguing about how tables should be tweaked. I'd like you to prove that you can make constructive edits to Wikipedia. Please read through our core content policies, how to cite sources, and this guide. Using this knowledge, please propose a constructive edit here on your talk page. It could be as simple as suggesting a fact that could be included in an article about your favorite video game or film, backed up with a citation to a reliable source. The proposed edit should be something that can be copied verbatim into an encyclopedia article. You can immediately make another unblock request with your response. If you need help understanding what I'm talking about, you can see that in Special:Diff/1075983265 I added a bit of sourced content and lots of citations to List of neo-Nazi bands. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Betty Logan: If there's something I'd like to edit, but I'm not sure, I'll talk to you first. Further, I will not change color scheme recklessly. Since you proposed to reblock me, I am posting here. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 00:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody needs my consent to lift the block, and there's no evidence of block evasion. However, I think this editor fundamentally lacks sufficient competence to edit here. Last time they were unblocked, they lasted only a day before violating the conditions. They were then incredibly disruptive, contesting that block. Frankly, I think Wikipedia is better off without them. --Yamla (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I am willing to contribute constructively to other Wikimedia projects in order to prove that I can make constructive edits here. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 00:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]