Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptic Fate (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:02, 16 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:02, 16 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Enigmamsg 00:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Cryptic Fate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article does not appear to meet WP:BAND. Enigmamsg 20:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, band is notable in Bangladesh, could be improved and referenced. Nominator did not place notices on article contributor talk pages, I have now done so. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Per Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (music). The Daily Star (Bangladesh) alone has published about a dozen articles featuring the band, and not just in the passing. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]... and, they were even mentioned by The Times of India (see: [10]). and the BRAC portal (see: [11]). I believe, more would be found if looked for. Aditya(talk • contribs) 10:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not my responsibility to source the article, but I will withdraw the nomination. Enigmamsg 00:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.