Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Longjohnlong/Archive

Longjohnlong

Longjohnlong (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

16 April 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

Longlongjohn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account created within 24 hours of blocking. Edited user talk page of old account and AfD page which old account had previously engaged with. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Definitely - one of the more egregious examples I have seen in my time editing Wikipedia. Seaphoto^Talk 02:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Sock indef blocked, and the master's block was extended to 1 month. Tiptoety ^talk 03:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

Puckpetspot (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New SPA pops up within 48 hours of previous SPA being blocked focused on St Leo's College, University of Queensland and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Leo's College, University of Queensland using similar policy-free arguments. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Administrator note Blatantly obvious, plus the username is an anagram of "sockpuppet" (with an extra "t"). I've blocked and tagged the latest puppet and upped the master to indef. —DoRD (talk) 12:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Marking for close. TN X Man 13:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

12 March 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

A Dad Oyster Utters (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

This edit on my talk page was made by one of User:Longjohnlongs socks which was quickly blocked. Shortly after User:A_Dad_Oyster_Utters appears and nominates the same two for at AfD in a slightly flawed way, as though they'd never done it before (or weren't using tools). I didn't make the connection until I'd already !voted delete / merge. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - for a sleeper check, also see now reverted diffs on this page. Rs chen 7754 09:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed, as are PhantomStick (talk · contribs) and LongJohn Puppett (talk · contribs), along with a host of other already blocked accounts. I am still reluctant to block the range, but it may become necessary if the disruption continues. —DoRD (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and closing. Rs chen 7754 10:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]