Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PropertyGuru Malaysia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:30, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 2:1, but the one "keep" isn't very convincing.  Sandstein  09:36, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PropertyGuru Malaysia[edit]

PropertyGuru Malaysia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, promotional, and cannot be verified. The only actually accessible sites are the company's own pages, and its self-writen description on Bloomberg. Everything else is a dead link. (ref 8 is a specialist paid site, but it looks like it too would be a directory entry) DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've already commented on the problems of some of these sites. DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Can't see enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Onel5969 TT me 13:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.